Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: CLA

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: CLA
From: "Richard Hawkins" <rhawkin3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:31:10 -0400
No holes, that way they don't ask for a three year warranty!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: CLA


> Tom,
> 
> It would be relatively inexpensive compared to the exhorbitant shipping 
> cost.  The camera holder requires the CLA, not the camera body.  First 
> problem to solve is the shipping container:  how many holes are required 
> and their diameter(s) so as not to degrade its mechanical integrity and 
> still provide a sufficient number for the container's contents.  This is 
> where the smiley goes:
> :-)
> 
> -- John
> 
> At 11:35 5/7/02, Thomas A. Simmons asked:
> 
> >After the last weeks posts, I'm wondering how much a CLA would cost?
> >In particular, fix the following problems:
> >
> >1) bad focusing
> >2) no film loaded
> >3) ASA meter incorrectly set
> >4) marketable picture lost because
> >      4a) lens cap still on lens
> >      4b) camera was at home
> >      4c) bad composition
> >      4d) "real" action at very edge of stupid picture
> >
> >Is it possible to have the camera come back with a varimagnifier?
> >Maybe a 350 F2? no extra charge? Is this where the smiley goes?
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz