Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: [OM] Introduction (Jim Timpe)

Subject: RE: RE: [OM] Introduction (Jim Timpe)
From: "Paul Kraig" <PaulKraig@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 07:30:15 -0500
Never using it was the reason I let it go.  That failure was/is mine, not
the lens - just hate to not be able to replace it when and if I find myself
wanting one.
Sometimes I fancy myself a fine carpenter, hence some very fine tools out in
the garage that never hardly get used - I would hate to see them go as well,
though they should.
Regards,
Paul Kraig

Sometimes I find my life full of contradictions

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Wayne Harridge
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:15 PM
To: olympus @ Zuiko . sls . bc . ca
Subject: Re: RE: [OM] Introduction (Jim Timpe)




> Paul Kraig <PaulKraig@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> for so long.  The only sorry note to that sale was that he also
> purchased my
> 24mm F2.0-silver nose-multi-coated-in the hard case -never used wide
> angle.

Why would you be sorry to see it go if you never used it ?

Just curious,


Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz