Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] L-5

Subject: RE: [OM] L-5
From: William Clark <wclark@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:23:49 -0500
Where can I find the announcement.  I have not seenthis thread until now.
What other info avialable?
-Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Pauls0627@xxxxxxx [mailto:Pauls0627@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:16 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] L-5


In a message dated 02/06/2002 11:54:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
ClassicVW@xxxxxxx writes:


I think this IS the 'real' IS-3 replacement if one reads Olympus' 
announcement carefully. It has a 'this camera does everything' and 'all 
you'll need' tone to it. 



ahhhh marketing ;-)

The main reason I don't see this camera being able to replace the IS-3 is 
it's rather sad flash capabilities. The built in flash is weaker than the
one 
on the -3 (makes me wonder how useful the Super FP capabilities will be with

it), and even worse, there doesn't seem to be support for the G-40 flash, or

any external flash for that matter. Even better than G-40 capability would 
have been a standard hot shoe with FL-40 (I think that's what it's called) 
dedication, don't you think?

 Admittedly I don't own an IS (although I see an IS-30 in my future to serve

P&S duties). I'd love to hear what some IS-3 owners out there think of the 
specs on this camera? AG-Schnozz, are you out there?

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz