Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] incident vs. reflected; Jackson

Subject: RE: [OM] incident vs. reflected; Jackson
From: "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:33:12 -0700
A young girl friend of mine was the caretaker for a $50 million-dollar
"cabin" in Jackson Wyoming for several years. The owner has one wall covered
with many Henry Jackson pictures worth about $100,000 each.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of William Sommerwerck
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:26 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] incident vs. reflected; Jackson


Whoops! I definitely know the difference, but I wrote incident when I meant
reflected.

I don't think William Henry Jackson shot 20x24. The plates would have been
horribly bulky, very fragile, and almost impossible to coat and develop. You
can get six 8x10s out of a 20x24 sheet. I'm pretty sure that's the size he
used
when wandering the West.

However... Jackson did take at least 900 pictures using "mammoth plates" as
large as 18x22. Most were taken near railroad lines, which would eliminate
the
problems of schlepping the equipment in a small wagon or on a burro.

See http://lcweb2.loc.gov/detroit/detmamm.html.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz