| Subject: | Re: [OM] Slide copying |
|---|---|
| From: | Paul Wallich <pw@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:36:06 -0500 |
At 9:18 AM -0500 1/12/02, Charles Monroe wrote: My experience with a homemade setup (light box and C2000 with a closeup lens) is that it probably isn't worth the trouble. You can get better resolution out of a cheap slide scanner or even a flatbed with a transparency adapter, and copying slides really showcases the shortcomings of digicam image sensors. (In particular, you lose a lot a sharpness because the color and brightness info get reconstructed from the values at adjacent pixels, and the dynamic range is a scant 8 stops with no adjustment) I also found that either the sensor or the digicam lens exhibited a fair amount of flare/halation, so that in addition to being blown out, bright areas of the slide also lightened the areas around them... paul -- Paul Wallich pw@xxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: HTML Curse Resolved????, DAVDOU9211 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Yahoo Mail and HTML, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Slide copying, Charles Monroe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Slide copying, Olympus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |