Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] GREEN B&W prints from T400CN WAS Which is sharper, autofocus or

Subject: Re: [OM] GREEN B&W prints from T400CN WAS Which is sharper, autofocus ormanual focus?
From: "Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:59:24 -0800
Unless I'm taking a macro shot of the inside of my nose, none of the prints
I receive should ever be olive green, or am I just asking too much here??

Yep, me and photoshop have a LONG ways to go...

Albert.
----- Original Message -----
From: "andrew fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] GREEN B&W prints from T400CN WAS Which is sharper,
autofocus ormanual focus?


> Kodak labs, pro or storefront, should have filter sets for both T400CN and
> Select B&W, as well as settings for colour toning and warm/cold prints. If
> they don't, they're undertrained or underequipped as these were advertised
> when the films first came along. Don't accept rubbish. I've found that a
> slight warmtone is the best result on colour papers.
> AndrewF
>
>
> >Bill,
> >
> >My minilab prints Kodak T400CN with perfect blacks and absolutely no
color
> >tinting.  They have a custom filter setting for the film and are very
> >careful when printing B&W negatives onto color paper.  They use an Agfa
> >minilab (model unknown).
> >
> >I'm not an expert, but I'd bet $100 that many prints could be corrected
by
> >proper filtration.  Is this a setting error?  Beats me.
> >
> >Skip
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz