At 01:13 12/13/01, Marc wrote:
> John A. Lind [mailto:jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> Not all members of this list are Zuikoholics. Some are merely
> Zuikohobbyists. In spite of what anyone else might say, I
> emphatically assert being part of the latter group.
...which is the final damning sign - denial - that he is a
member of the former. Is that how it goes?
Cheers
Marc (who only wants just one more Zuiko, and that's it)
Sydney, Oz
I absolutely deny being "in denial!" I can quit any time I want
to. Zuikohobbyism has been such a rewarding source of enjoyment that
stopping is inconceivable.
Scurrilous rumors about being a Zuikoholic "enabler" are just
that. Indeed, I am very willing to accept custody of OM gear from any
Zuikoholic to help fight the onslaught of their disease (especially an
8/2.8 fisheye, 21/2 wide angle, 24/3.5 shift, 100/2 telephoto, 180/2.8
telephoto, or 1.4X-A teleconverter).
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|