I'd like to see the Zuiko 90/2 Macro go up against the Leica 100 APO Macro
Elmarit-R (F2.8), or even the older 100 Macro Elmar-R (F4). Those would be
the closest equivalent competitors.
Mark Hammons
> Which Leica? The Leica 90/2 for SLR is cheaper than the Zuiko 90/2
> here. My friend had one in 9-, he got it at around $560 (it was
> finally sold to a shop at $500).
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
> "O.C" wrote:
> >
> > At 04:33 AM Wednesday 1/08/2001, you wrote:
> > >Well, I work really late (what do you expect from a small software
> > >business owner/programmer/tech-support/janitor from Silicon Valley? ) and
> > >before I went to bed at 4AM, I placed a top bid of $720 on the 90/2 Macro.
> > >The auction closed at 7AM. I figure a new one from B&H is $999 so while a
> > >discount of 28 0sn't great, and I'm sure this lens USED to only sell for
> > >$550 range, it is a pretty good price. Besides, I was almost certain that
> > >I will be outbidded...
> > >
> > >Well, looks like I am now a proud owner of a 90/2!!!
> >
> > Richard the 90/2 is a brilliant lens. I'm sure you'll be very happy with
> > it. Just remember Leica owners pay mega bucks for their version and the
> > Zuiko outperforms it in tests.
> >
> > Oben
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|