Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] 85/2 vs. 100/2 (was "200/2")

Subject: [OM] 85/2 vs. 100/2 (was "200/2")
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:09:00 -0500
From: "John Pendley" <jpendley@xxxxxxx>
I have the 85/2 and love it. The perspective is just right for me. I don't
have a 100/2, and I'm sure it's a great lens, but I do have a very nice
100/2.8 which I've hardly used since I got the 85/2.

If the 90/2 and 100/2 are more or less of comparable quality and sharpness, the 85/2 is very good but would not be quite as good as the 100/2.

The 85/2 is about the same size as the 100/2.8. It is really a pleasure to use because of its size. (It feels more like it fits into the Zuiko 2.8 stable.) But if I had to have one lens among the 85/2, 90/2, and 100/x.x, it would be the 90/2.

Joel W.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz