At 06:13 AM 7/12/01 -0400, Doggre@xxxxxxx ("Rich") wrote:
In a message dated 7/11/01 5:54:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Have e-mailed the seller, and received a reply. He's graciously
offered to
> refund me the purchase price, which is, of course, perfectly fair.
>
> Ah well, lessons learned. He wants to check his photos to see if the
> damage shows up in any of them. I've told him I'll wait to hear from him
> again before sending the lens back.
>
So what's he thinking? That it's O.K. to call an item "Mint", if the damage
is visible in a photo???
I think that's an unfair inference. What I think he's musing about is
whether he remembers any such damage (he says he doesn't, and I'm quite
inclined to believe him at this point). He's hoping the pictures will
either jog his memory, or would have recorded something that perhaps he
overlooked.
Garth
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|