Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Not quite a $150 85/2

Subject: Re: [OM] Not quite a $150 85/2
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 22:24:32 -0700
on 7/1/01 8:53 PM, Andrew Dacey at frugal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Okay, so no sooner do I question the possibility of finding a $150 85/2 then
> I find one for auction on everyone's favourite auction site (which I haven't
> visited in months).
> 
> Now I will admit that I did get a bit carried away because I really want one
> of these lenses, so I didn't get it for $150. In actuality, it came to $306.
> 
> Mind you it does also have a nice back cap, an OM-1n.
> 
> Does this count as a fang? I suppose a lot will depend on the condition of
> the item and what you consider to be the average price for an OM-1n.

I make it to be a $150 85/2.0 on a $150 OM-1n, so you win twice. Enjoy it!
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney... 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz