Olympus-OM

Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or

from Tom Scales

Subject:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or
From:	"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:36:57 -0500

Yes, that seems to be my daughters' approach.

Tom
>
> The moral of this story is: Encourage your parents to collect OM
equipment.
>
> Paul



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or electronic s..., Timpe, Jim Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Paul Farrar Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Tom Scales <= Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, T . Clausen Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Tom Scales

Previous by Date:	RE: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical orelectronic s..., Chip Stratton
Next by Date:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical orelectronic s..., Tom Scales
Previous by Thread:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Paul Farrar
Next by Thread:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, T . Clausen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]