Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Fungus on lens.. is it worth buying??

Subject: Re: [OM] Fungus on lens.. is it worth buying??
From: "Dr. Oben Candemir" <dunya.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:42:44 +1000
I would suggest that the 50mm f1.8 is such a common lens that you could almost certainly find one without for a little more. Small amounts of fungus probably don't make as much difference as we might think. But given that the lens is common I'd give it a skip.

If you are interested in a 50mm f1.4 with a small amount of fungus then I have one available that I haven't gotten round to having cleaned because the amount is so miniscule and doesn't affect picture quality at all. I'll offer it to you for $120 AUS. Its the latest multicoated version of the lens and if you were very obsessive you could have it cleaned for $40 AUS thats still cheaper than the Australian going rate for these lenses (about $199). Its very nice otherwise.

At 09:34 PM Thursday 24/05/2001, you wrote:
I would like your opinions on wether or not it is worth buying the following lenses that have been offered to me. The 1st lens is a Zuiko MC 50mm f1.8 Serial number 2338038. It has fungus on one of the inner lenses and the aperture blades are a little slow in snapping open, other than that the lens is in very good order.
The 2cnd lens is a Brighton Auto 2x Tele Converter Multi-Coated.
I have the chance to buy the two lenses at AUS $50.00. It seems to be an excellent buy but I'm only new to this and seek the knowledge of the list to wether or not this is a good deal!! Thanks to the list member that helped solve my depth of field query for the OM-10. It was very helpful!!

Cheers Adam


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz