Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] RE: 90 vs 100 (again)

Subject: Re: [OM] RE: 90 vs 100 (again)
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 20:54:41 +0800
The way to read MTF (actually the contrast is MTF at 30lp/mm) is to analysis
both resolution and contrast, at F2 they both have similar resolution,
different only 1lp/mm, but the ontrast of 100/2 is much higher, that
means for lower contrast objects, the resolution of 100/2 will be much
higher. At F2.8 100/2 has obvious higher resolution and ontrast. Actually
I wanted to say "wider" aperture not only the largest aperture.

100/2

Resolution (lines/mm) at 1:49x
Center: Ex 55   Ex 62   VG 62   Ex 69   Ex 69   Ex 62   VG 55   VG 55
Corner: Ex 49   Ex 55   Ex 55   Ex 62   Ex 62   Ex 55   Ex 49   Ex 49

Contrast(%) at 30 lines/mm
Center: Hi 54   Hi 62   Hi 62   Hi 65   Hi 68   Hi 60  Hi 50  Hi 47
Corner: Hi 42   Hi 50   Hi 54   Hi 56   Hi 58   Hi 49    Hi 41  Hi 39

90/2

Resolution (lines/mm) at 1:50x
Center: Ex 56  Ex 56  Ex 63  Ex 70  Ex 70  Ex 63  Ex 56  VG 50
Corner: Ex 50  Ex 50  Ex 50  Ex 56  Ex 63  Ex 56  Ex 50   Ex 45

Contrast (%) at 30 lines/mm
Center: Low 30  Med 47  Hi 69   Hi 68  Hi 60   Hi 54   Hi 48   Low 33
Corner: Low 25  Med 30  Med 43  Hi 45  Hi 50   Hi 42   Hi 40   Low 27

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan" <atk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>   You can check Modern Photography test report at:
>
>   http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/mp-zuiko-tests.txt
>
>   which shown 100/2 is better at wide aperture, I'm not interested on
>   photodo's report, the 28/2 owner will tell how they love the lens, but
>   check the result in photodo, it is almost the poorest fixed lens.
>
> ---
>
> Huh -- the link  you pointed me towards indicate both lens have about the
> same resolution wide open (slight favor for the 90). The 100 has (much)
> higher contrast according to those tests.
>
> Can't comment on the 28f2 - never owned/used it but yea photodo results
look
> pretty bad for that lens - maybe it was a bad sample. Their results for
the
> 90/100 look pretty close to what modern has (cept you would predict
contrast
> to be closer at f2). I've never been an mtf fan since most of my shots are
> not taken at infinity. Oh well.
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz