> I carry around the little respected 135/3.5 and 200/5
> even though I have the bigger Zuiko brothers,
Is this lack of respect due to the ubiquitous nature of the 135/3.5 and
the plethora of big brothers and sisters in the range of the 200/5 or is
it due to mediocrity? Personally i find satisfaction carrying in the
"palm of my hand" what others have to hire a porter to haul around.
Well, maybe that's over stating a bit but you get the idea :)
So for example, should I avoid the 100~200 because it is so cheap or is
it a decent lens but cheap because a lot of them are out there? I
suspect that this is the case with the 75~150, the 135/3.5 and the
28/3.5. It seems to me that a dog or two might slip into any line even
Olympus. Comments?
Mike
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|