Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 18mm is no substitute for a 24mm shift

Subject: Re: [OM] 18mm is no substitute for a 24mm shift
From: "Paul Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:37:37 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Folks
> 
> At risk of sounding pedantic, comparing the 18mm and 24mm shift lenses
> in this way is very misleading and not at all productive. The 24 shift
> may have an angle of *coverage* as the 18mm lens, but the angle of
> *view* is dependent on the format, so it's the same as any other 24mm
> lens. The extra coverage of the 24 shift allows movement without
> vignetting. That's all. The comparison with the 18mm is marketing hype,
> and a poorchoice at that.
> 
> The 90mm Super Angulon lens has the about the same angle of view as the
> 21mm Zuiko, but only for 5x7 format. Slap the same SA lens onto a 35mm
> film and it's got the same angle of view as any other 90mm lens.
> 
> 
> Vaughan

It's productive because it shows that a common misconception is false.
The 18mm cannot substitute for a 24mm shift, as I have seen people 
state. See other post for diagram and explanation.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz