exactly! if one wants such a "flat lens" then maybe you should go for a
point and shoot.
From: "Chris O'Neill" <coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: "John Duggan" <john.duggan1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Zuiko 40/2 Values
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:57:37 -0600
On 1 Apr 2001, at 20:05, John Duggan wrote:
> Further to this posting.....!/2 way down page...3/09/2001... Olympus 2.0
> 40mm needs diaphram work $300 Theo van Leeuwen. Is this one for John H
or
> Clint?
There we go again.... driving-up the prices of equipment until they're
totally through the roof!!!
Since it's only 40mm (10 less than the 50/1.8), and an F2 (.3 stops
slower than a 50/1.8), it should only be worth... uhhh... 'bout $20 to
$30 bucks!
Right?!?!?
Regards,
Chris
---
I'm *not* a Zuikoholic.... I'm a Zuikohobbiest!
Chris O'Neill (coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx)
http://www.nucleus.com/~coneill
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|