| Subject: | [OM] IS 3 vs IS 300 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:05:36 +0800 |
What are the differences between the two? Knowing that these cameras are well respected by professionals as a near ideal point and shoot, what would summarize their strengths and weaknesses? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re:[OM] Announcing - a new addition, Ray Moth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Re: [OM] Announcing - a new addition, Garth Wood |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Photo.net Picture of the Week - Definitely OM content!, c.e.packard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IS 3 vs IS 300, Per Nordenberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |