Just curious to know in which way his OM bodies were failed, two years ago I
have bought a set of OM from a professional photography (unfortunately he
had already sold three OM-3s to his friend before that, but the set did
included my most favourite 21/2), the guy looked energetic and smart. He is
also a documentary photography and of course not as famous as Eugene
Richard, but he told me the OMs has accompanied with him to run over almost
the whole China and he also had contributed to National Geographic. The very
ugly OM4 I got from him is now the most reliable and accurate OM that I
have.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: <GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx>
> C.H.
> I should have been more specific. Yes, you are right, the article in Pop
> Photo only referenced a 21F2.0 and small 35mm bodies that had proven to be
> fragile. At the end of article, an address was given to get the complete
> Eugene Richards interview. I sent off for that and in the complete
interview,
> the Zuiko and Olympus names were mentioned. Also, several years ago
Keppler
> ran an article on manual focus lens and cameras. At the end of the
article,
> an address was given to get a list of Kepplers Olympus collection. I've
got
> that also.
>
> Gary Faulkenberry
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|