Thanks for the feedback, everyone, on the lens. Seems that the consensus is,
it's an OK chunk of glass, but the 180 is better (and way more expensive, I
note in browsing the net).
I'm in basic agreement with Thomas, in that I don't need "technical
excellence" as my requirements aren't *that* exacting and what I'm looking
for is decent pictures.
Now to find one at a reasonable price...
---
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 18:01
To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 200mm f4
Scott,
I have one - and it is a nice piece of glass. I am one of those people,
who do not know (or care) too much about anything about a lens but if I
like what I get on the film. And I am pretty satisfied with the 200/4. I
am trying to remember what I paid for it, I think it was about $100 or so
(but I probably bought it in a packet with other stuff), howwever it was
in absolutely mint condition.
Best regards
--thomas
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Scott Gomez wrote:
> Anyone have a quick and dirty opinion on this lens? What's a fair price
for
> ex+ condition?
>
> ---
> Scott Gomez
>
--
Mange hilsner / Sincerely
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|