Makes one wonder what great shots doidn't make it at all, but then that is the
nature of contests for such a subjective thing.
Jim Couch
Lex Jenkins wrote:
> Well, I was hoping to avoid this topic since I've never been certain whether
> it's okay to criticize criticism, but...
>
> WERE THOSE THE DAMNEDEST RESULTS OR WHAT!!!
>
> I mean, really...what in holy heck were the judges thinking! Most of the
> best photos were third places, honorable mentions and also-rans.
>
> Sheesh. Just another example of why it's ridikilus to tack labels like
> "winner" and "loser" onto creative output.
>
> Now if you'll pardon me I'm gonna go watch football. At least scoring in it
> makes sense.
> ===========
> Lex Jenkins
> ===========
>
> >Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 19:08:14 +0800
> >From: "tmlee" <clairetm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >... I just feel the Grand Prize pics were sort of a letdown, compared
> >against the other place winners...
> >
> >...Anyone share my view ?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|