| Subject: | RE: [OM][OT] Small Type |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:45:48 -0800 |
Think it has to do with whether or not you have HTML enabled for replies. I don't normally enable for this list 'cause it messes up some displays.And, I don't use AOL. A side issue is that it is ugly. Brian's reply has at least two font sizes and the type looks like one of those TWX messages I used to pick up when I was on courier duty in the army. I don't know whether that is a result of font substitution because I don't have his font on my computer. Winsor -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California, USA mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography, Larry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography, Larry |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Zuiko 300/4.5: price, opinions, etc., Brian P. Huber |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM][OT] Small Type, Brian P. Huber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |