i've been looking at the tamron 90/2.5 as a good alternative to a longer
macro, and i am very partial to the earlier 49mm version. i believe the two
variants were discussed some time ago, but my memory often fails me. is the
49mm or 55mm version preferred? is one optically superior, or are they
close enough that i should go for the all metal, older 49mm lens? (and if
anyone has the 49mm version they are thinking of selling, it might be good
to contact me!!!)
any firsthand experience would be appreciated.
thanks, james.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|