Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: Provia 100F versus Kodachrome

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Provia 100F versus Kodachrome
From: "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 09:38:55 -0500
Yes, you really need the 18 AND the 16/3.5 full-frame fisheye....

Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: Harridge, Wayne <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 3:17 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] Re: Provia 100F versus Kodachrome


> Chris wrote:
>
> >
> > So, out I walked with a roll of Provia to try out.  Yup!
> > It's YOUR fault
> > that I keep spending money on my addict... uhhh... hobby!
>
> That's nothing, however you will NEED an extra body to put that Provia in
!
>
> >
> > P.S.  Please don't *anybody* rave about the OM-4ti or the 18mm
> > fisheye...  I just *can't* afford it right now!  (Grin!)
> >
>
> The 18mm isn't a fisheye, but a great lens anyhow !
>
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
> http://www.geocities.com/wayneharridge/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz