Hi Gary,
At Wednesday, August 16, 2000 20:10, Gary Edwards <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
spoke about *Re: [OM] Street shooting (a little ...* saying
> Well, if anyone is interested in the results of the 200 f/5 with a 2X-A, see
> http://members.home.com/captaintombrooks/angel_comparison.htm
> for a comparison of f/5 (effectively f/10) and f/11 (f/22).
>
> The results are pretty grim wide open. Shots are full frame PictureCD scans
> from Fuji 400 negatives with only Photoshop autobalance and 1500nsharp
> mask applied. OM-4T on self-timer and on a tripod, of course.
>
> Unfortuneately, Gary Reese has not repeated his tests of this combination
> with an aperture-prefiring body. But this quick and dirty comparison is not
> promising.
Kind of ambiguous. Not promising for who? Ah, I get it. Just a teaser
for the web site...
Tom
------------
Tom Trottier <TomATrottier@xxxxxxxx> ICQ: 57647974
Abacurial Information Technology Consulting
400 Slater St. Suite 415, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7S7
__o +1 613 291-1168 fax:594-5412 (877)247-8796
_ \< Vote for your favourite Olympus camera at
(+)/'(+) http://www.freevote.com/booth/fav_camera
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|