John,
You know it's interesting. I prefer the 85 to the 100 as well. It's small,
light, easy to handle and produces wonderful pics. The 100/2 has it's
place, but the 85/2 is more useful.
Tom
From: "John Palmer" <john.palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<snip>
> OM content - you can guess what camera I used for the film without the
> drying marks. More interesting is that I've had a mild attack of
> Scalesitis this year and acquired a used 85/2 and 100/2 and was using
> them at a very poorly-lit rock gig in a pub. The 100 is undoubtedly a
> lovely lens, but I found the 85 was ideal for the job. Field of view
> just about right, compact, lightweight and very easy-handling. I can
> see it getting lots more use for this kind of work.
>
> John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|