Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] M42

Subject: Re: [OM] M42
From: Christopher Biggs <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Apr 2000 18:38:32 +1000
WKato@xxxxxxx moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly:

> If there's only 0.5 mm difference I don't see why not?  You could just forego 
> the 0.5 and let it focus a little past infinity.  However, I have never seen 
> one.

It's 0.5mm the wrong way.  The lens would focus "not quite to
infinity".  However, I bet that depth of field effects would make
"near enough" good enough.

I've seen a low profile adapter for pentaxK->M42, and I've been told
there's one for OM, but never sighted it.

cjb.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Christopher Biggs - Stallion Technologies - chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
The IEEE has monitored this electronic mail message, and asserts that no
energy was created or destroyed during its construction or transmission.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz