Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] How come more pros aren't Olympians?

Subject: Re: [OM] How come more pros aren't Olympians?
From: Morgan Sparks <msparks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 11:11:02 -0400
Doris wrote:
> 
>   Pros flocked to Nikon first because of reports in the '50s
> from PJs like DDDuncan and others. 

That's right. . . .Nikon had a "pro" buzz right from the start. 
Remember that when the first Nippon Kogaku lenses came out, Japanese
goods weren't well regarded. . . .paper mache trinkets, and the pressed
tin car toys.  (I remember as a small boy looking in the wheel wells to
see what it was made from: usually a can of Sanka or Heinz.)  It was
Nikon--and especially Sony--that changed that.  Nikon aimed for the pro
market with full-featured system SLR's, while most other makers,
including Olympus, were prying consumers away from their Kodaks with
cute little 1960's rangefinders.

Also, it wasn't easy to become a Nikon dealer.  You had to be a very
good camera store, while any decent Mom-and-Pop could sell Konica,
Minolta, Canon and Olympus.  To an extent, that's still true today.

Morgan Sparks

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz