| Subject: | RE: [OM] Print quality of Kodak Gold film |
|---|---|
| From: | Dave Bulger <dbulger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Feb 2000 18:32:44 -0600 |
> So, to answer the question that was posed about the print quality of Kodak > Gold 100 ASA: I'd say go for it! > > Cheers! > Olafo > I agree completely! While it's fallen out of fashion to like the Kodak print films, I've had excellent, consistent results with the Royal Gold 100. Dave < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Camera and lens insurance, Denton Taylor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Better Flash recs & handle mounted flash Q, Harridge, Wayne |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Print quality of Kodak Gold film, Olaf Greve |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] RE: OT: Darkroom Enviro-hazards, Pauls0627 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |