Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Polygons

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Polygons
From: "Ian A. Nichols" <I.A.Nichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 16:59:09 +0000 (GMT)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Garry Lewis wrote:

> >>>What's wrong with "heptagonal"? and in the interest of scientific rigour 
> >>>we should try decagonal, dodecagonal and
> duodecagonal at least.<<
> 
> All this AGONIZING over AGONALS has caused me AGONY and I think I'm AGONA 
> have a headache.

You're all lucky I'm not an organic chemist, otherwise I'd be waffling
on about agonists and antagonists by now ;)

> BTW, the door on the birdcage was left open so-POLYGON

Didn't leave enough polyfilla, so she had to escape to search for food,
obviously.

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
*             |                                                        |
|  /  | |/-\  |                      Ian A. Nichols                    |
| |   | |   | |                                                        |
|  \-/| |  /  |                  i.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxxx                |
|             *                    iann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx                  |
------------------------------------------------------------------------





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz