On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Giles wrote:
|
|Wouldn't this cause a problem in testing the 90/2 ? Gary tested it at
|1:40, if he were to test it at 1:10, which it is presumably optimised for,
|he might run out of room at the high end of his scale ;-)
That CAN be problematic! ;-) Seriously, I would like to see these two
lenses (and any other lens for that matter) tested at their optimal
image quality settings. I don't own a 100/2 or I'd do it myself.
|John A. Prosper wrote:
|
|> I'll take this one. I feel that lenses should be tested at their
|> optimum image quality setting. For the 85/2 and 100/2, this setting
|> is infinity. For the 90/2 macro, it's 1:10 lifesize.
|>
|> This way the great subplot about: who's sharper---the 90/2 or the
|> 100/2 can be finally resolved to every one's satistfaction.
|>
|
|< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
|< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|