| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM1 or OM1n needed |
|---|---|
| From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:46:17 EDT |
In a message dated 09/28/1999 11:34:10 AM EST, Nick.Smoliga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Probably due to funds available not meeting the cost of repair. That's an > accountant's definition of "un-repairable". > A better phrase would be- B.E.R. (beyond ECONOMICAL repair). After all, ain't just about everything "repairable"? George S. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OM5+6a - was - Re: I just caught wind that Canon is coming out with an EOS 3n (Long), Motor Sport Visions Photography |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: I just caught wind that Canon is coming out with an EOS 3n, Keith (R.K.) Berry |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM1 or OM1n needed, Smoliga Nick Contr AEDC/SVT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM1 or OM1n needed, Michael Stoesz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |