Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: [OM] 90 macro

Subject: Re: Re[2]: [OM] 90 macro
From: "Paul Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:09:46 -0600 (CST)
> 
> Charles wrote:
> 
> >There is no glass so it is very light to carry and there is no image
> >degradation.
> 
> Years ago there was a test of macro lenses, and in one sentence they said,
> that the extension tubes don't degrade the image quality, because there are
> no lenses inside. The funny thing was, that the Tokina 90mm 1:2,5 was the
> lens with the best 1:1 performance with its extension tubes with three
> elements. In this test, there were some general "good" original
> manufacturers macro lenses with an "insufficient" performance at 1:1, some
> of them used extension tubes without optical elements. So their conclusion
> and their own test results conflicted.
> 
> Matthias

Extension tubes do degrade the image -- by causing the lens to operate at
a focal distance it may not have been optimized for. Many lenses, for instance,
develop substantial field curvature when extended. A converter optimized for
a lens may give superior performance.

Paul Farrar

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz