Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35-70 f:3.6 vs. 35-70 f:3.5-4.5

Subject: Re: [OM] 35-70 f:3.6 vs. 35-70 f:3.5-4.5
From: "Keith (R.K.) Berry" <keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:52:56 -0000
From: Alexander <mediadyne@xxxxxx>


>Ok, since we are on this topic. Does anyone have any comparison to the
35-70 F4
>with the above? I would realy apreciate it.
>
This is my favourite OM Zuiko (well, I only have four) and probably use it
the most. Its price when I bought it from new was so low, comparatively,
that I wasn't expecting much from it, but it's never disappointed me. It
came with a rubber lens hood, set, naturally, for the 35mm setting, and if
you are using a polariser you have to focus first because the barrel
revolves. I haven't tried the other variants and there's nothing lacking in
the f4 that would compel me to look for anything else in this range.

Regards,
Keith
keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz