You can't go wrong with a 4T or Ti.
John
Jay Maynard wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 05:16:02PM -0800, Charles Loeven wrote:
> > If you had to choose only one OM body to own and rely on, which one would it
> > be?
>
> Urk.
>
> I don't own a -4 or a -4T[i] yet (next week, I hope), but I'm a little too
> leery of the reports of electronic failures to put it at the top of the list.
> Same for the -2SP. I guess I'm torn between a -2n or a -1n; the pure
> mechanical reliability of the -1 weighs in favor of it, but the
> unavailability of the right battery for it weighs against it. I have two
> -2s, one of which I've owned for over 20 years andthe other looks like it's
> been through several wars but still runs reliably (and THAT came as no small
> surprise); I also have a -1 and a -1n, both of which may well go in to
> John's shop for the MR-9 mod (if I can't figure out how to come up with
> reliable regulation myself, that is).
>
> Boy, Charlie, you don't ask easy questions, do you?
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|