Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-1 vs. OM-2

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-1 vs. OM-2
From: "Yvan Lindekens" <yvan.lindekens@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 06:31:01 +0100
Hi Charles,

I don't know about the OM-2, but the OM-1n is pretty vibration free with
the mirror locked up: I've used it for photomicrography: fluid mounts and
magnificitions up to 1250x, shutter speeds between 1/250 and 32s...

----------
> Van: Charles Loeven <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Aan: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Onderwerp: Re: [OM] OM-1 vs. OM-2
> Datum: maandag 16 november 1998 1:39
> 
> I have one burning question about the OM's without mirror lock up.
> Is the vibration dampened enough for macro and super telephoto?
> TTL exposure being the key factor for the OM2 vs OM1.
> If it is vibration free, I may conceed the MLU for our new OM2002. :-)
> 
> Charles Loeven
> cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz