Hans wrote:
-----
>The choice between the 24 and 35 mm shift lenses depends on the size
>and height of the building, shooting distance and your bank account.
>The 35 mm, when shifted at the max, effectively becomes a 24 mm
lens.
>This means that if you can frame a building at a certain distance
with
>a normal 24 mm wide angle (by pointing the camera upwards and
>introducing unwanted vertical perspective distortions) you can use
the
>35 mm shift in this case to eliminate this distortion.
-----
I am sorry Hans, but I think you are a little bit wrong here.
Yes, the 35mm shift's image circle covers the angle of view of a normal
24mm. (The 24mm shift eaquals that of the 18mm).
But if you have to tilt a normal 24mm lens to get a building in the frame,
you also have to tilt the fully shifted 35mm shift.
AFAIK, The right approach would be: If you can get a building into the
frame on a normal 24mm lens without tilting, you can also get it (the
height) into the frame with the 35mm shifted. If you can get a building.
Same goes for normal 18mm and 24mm shift.
Wiliam
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|