Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] N*k*n

Subject: [OM] N*k*n
From: Steven_Read@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 07:05:03 -0400

Don't be daft you two.  For most this has nothing to do with copyright.  This is
a form of Olympus bigot swearing.  We can't bring ourselves to do more than
mumble "Those Other Names From Clearly Lesser Camera's".  Thus Leica is
mentionable when talking about the rangefinders but L**caFl*x is a curse.
Whomever obliterated the fine (all bow to the rising sun) names Zuiko and
Olympus must surely have Turretes (sp?) Syndrome?

==============
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 22:13:45 -0400
From: John Hermanson <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Manual Camera Odyssey

I WONDERED why people did that.  Olympus, Nikon, Canon, Minolta, Ricoh,
yashica, Pentax, Leica, Omega, Bogen, Brockway, Gossen, Metz, Bronoica,
Rollei and so on.....

John

R. Lee Hawkins wrote:

> In your message dated: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 19:47:07 EDT you write:
> >
> >Interesting.... Don't the Z**i*o lenses fit all of the O*y**u*
>                            ^^^^^^                       ^^^^^^^
>
> Why do people do this?  I guess I could understand it from posters from
> the UK, where libel laws are harsher than they are in the US, but have
> never understood why US posters do it.  What's the point?  Are you
> actually afraid Olympus, Nikon, Canon, etc are going to read your post
> and sue you because you didn't put in a disclaimer that those names are
> copyrights of their respective companies?  :)
>
> Cheers,
> --Lee (who is confuzed more often than not these days)



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz