In a message dated 6/26/98 8:44:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, PCACala@xxxxxxx
writes:
<< I know of no optical difference between the two Zuiko models, except the
newer
goes to a non utilizable f/32 >>
Hi Gary & George,
Gary, I disagree with the comment for ("non - utilizable") f 32. If there was
ever a situation where the smallest apertures have a need, it is in macro
work. The need for more depth of field is always present. Interesting enough
OLY has made the 135 mm f 4.5 macro with an incredible "f 45". I see the f 32
as a PLUS for the new style.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|