In a message dated 6/18/1998 3:48:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I wonder what the 50mm f3.5 would come out like. Better or worse than the
> f2.0?
Hi Foxy:
I tested those against each other years ago. The 3.5 was no match for the 2.0
at f/4.0 and was marginally poorer at 5.6. At f/8 to 16 they were film
limited (i.e., you couldn't detect a difference with normal shooting films).
The f/22 setting (on the 3.5 only) was kind of soft.
Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|