Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] MC/Non-MC and Individuality

Subject: Re: [OM] MC/Non-MC and Individuality
From: Gene Mayeda <gmayeda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 13:12:55 -0600
Cc: olympus-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think that the lens designers really wet their pants when multicoating
became a reality because they were able to build zooms with more
elements and still increase contrast over single coated zoom lens
designs.
-Gene


Clive Warren wrote:
> 
> At 10:19 pm +0000 18/2/98, Kennedy wrote:
> 
> >In article , Clive Warren <Clive.Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >>At 11:59 pm +0000 17/2/98, Kennedy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>In article , PCACala@xxxxxxx writes
> >>>>
> >>>>Hum, a 3 0ncrease in transmittance.  Reminds me of the marginal
> >>>>performance
> >>>>increase from a 200 to 233 MHz Pentium.
> >>>>
> >>>Its not the 3 0ncrease in transmission that makes the difference, but
> >>>the more than 75% relative reduction in reflection.
> >>
> >>
> >>If you like taking shots with the sun or a bright light source in your
> >>photos.  Where did the 75 0.000000igure come from anyway?
> >
> >>From your own figures, actually, Clive!  :-)
> >
> >You quoted 95% Tx for single coating and 98% Tx for multicoating.
> >Assuming that the optical glass absorbs 1% (a conservative estimate),
> >this means that the single coating reflects 4%, and the multicoating
> >reflects 1%, giving a 75% *relative* reduction in reflection over the
> >single coated part.  If the glass absorbs more than 1%, then the
> >relative reduction is even greater.
> >
> >You don't actually need a bright light source in your image to see the
> >difference - veiling glare is the bane of all 'contra-jour' or backlit
> >work.
> 
> Yo Kennedy I own up - you know that 750f almost nothing is still almost
> nothing though ;-)    See that's the trouble with statistics and how they
> sold Super MC to the general public.......
> 
> Take your point about 'contra-jour' or backlit work - have had some really
> crazy spaceship like flare from a Zuiko 35-135 and equally scary from a
> 50mm f1.8 MC from fire sculpture work.  Ironically it was some of the
> excessive flare photos that people really liked :-)
> 
> All the best,
> 
>               Clive   http://clive.bel-epa.com

############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz