I think I might find they compliment each other. I do like the elegance of
the OM-1 compared to the Maxxum 800/650si I own. And it does have some
indiviuality. So did my Contax, but that was a lot bigger :) But I have a
LOT of money wrapped up in Maxxum, so I don't see myself changing camera
systems anyime real soon.
The OM is there to satisfy my desire to get my hands back into the process.
The Maxxums are extremely capable, but the OM is simple and hands-on.
We'll see.
At 04:12 PM 2/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Lipphardt <liphardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 2:10 PM
>Subject: [OM] OM-1 question(s)
>
>
>>OK, I just got my OM-1. It's in beautiful condition, but I do have a few
>>questions...
>>
>>
>>Mike Lipphardt liphardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>Oops, a Minoltaphile in the group. Actually, another Minoltaphile. Careful,
>you might get hooked on Olympus like I did.
>
>Doug
>
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|