Garth Wood wrote:
>
> Paul, Larry:
>
> Unlax, dudes. For some reason, you've managed to get each other's goat.
> Personally, I don't have any problems with people piping up that the
> equipment someone is thinking of buying is available from them, whether the
> source be private or retail. Nor have I found Paul's ("Olympus Guy")
> messages to be excessive. (Although I *am* surprised, after perusing his
> Web site, that he doesn't seem to carry the Olympus Centurion... ;-) ) To
> me, it's reasonably appropriate information, and if you don't like it,
> e-mail has a wonderful quality -- you can always filter the unwanted
> messages out using a variety of criteria. I'm sure some people are already
> doing that with *my* messages, truth be told...
>
> Garth
>
> "Q.: What's the difference between a Nikon zealot and a terrorist?
> A.: You can reason with a terrorist."
>
I second you, Garth.
To get back to the subject: Does anyone else but Gary Schloss have
an opinion on the 28-48mm zoom? I have an eye on one sitting in a
dealer's window, which I might buy. It looks like a good supplement
to the 75-150mm for light travel.
Lars
--
Lars Haven <lhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> aka <lhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
"When writing about women, one must dip one's pen in a rainbow"
D. Diderot
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|