Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Inexpensive way to macrophotography

Subject: Re: [OM] Inexpensive way to macrophotography
From: flzhgn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 22:53:54 -0600 (CST)
Cc: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Another question:  Didn't John Shaw mention something about stopping
                   down with the reversed lens rather than the prime lens?
                   
                   The 50mm reversed onto the 200mm gives 4X magnification
                   over life size.  One drawback is that there seems to be
                   only a one inch working distance.  I will try to sneak up
                   on a small insect but I think the lack of working distance
                   is a problem, and it's a characteristic of the reversed lens
                   independant of the "prime" lens.

                   Now I'm not "chicken" to photograph an ANT, unless ofcourse
                   it's a Driver Ant or an Army Ant or for that matter a real 
                   Aunt.

                   It might be better to reverse the 50mm onto a doubler or 
                   extension doubler which is how I took the Medfly pictures
                   on my web page at http://www.netcom.com/~flzhgn/medfly.htm

                  Hank
                   
On 01/16/98 14:54:14 you wrote:
>
>At 11:31 AM 1/16/98 -0600, Ken Norton wrote:
>>Oops, do we have a magnification ratio calculation error here?
>>
>>>> I then used a 50mm f/1.4 reversed onto a 135mm f/3.5. This gives roughly
>>>> 2.7 times magnification (50/135).
>>
>>Hmm.  Doesn't it go the other way?  50/135=.37  That's 1/3 magnification
>>not 2.7x. If I put a 50mm reversed on a 50mm, I get 1:1 magnification.  If
>>I put the 50mm on a 100mm I get a 1:2 magnification.  A 50 on a 200 would
>>give you 1:4 magnification.  You will only get greater than life size by
>>reversing a longer focal length on a shorter focal length.  For example, a
>>50mm reversed on a 35mm is 50/35=1.4x magnification.  A 200mm reversed on a
>>50mm will give you 4x magnification (and serious vigneting too).
>>
>The magnification is defined by:
> M=Image Distance/Subject Distance. 
>Since your image is formed on the film in your camera, the image distance
>is the focal length of the lens ("prime" called by John Shaw)  directly
>attached to the camera and the subject distance is the focal length of the
>reversed lens.
>
>Therefore,
>M= Focal Length of the prime lens/ Focal length of reversed lens
>
>The top example: 50mm reversed onto 135mm
>M=135mm/50mm=2.7
>
>
>Tomoko Yamamoto
>Photographer, Composer, Soprano
>mailto:tomokoy@xxxxxxxxx
>http://www.charm.net/~tomokoy/
>-All the photos (except panorama) with OM's-
>http://ep.com/ep/csp.html?csp=1130
>-Olympus Equipment Classifieds-
>
>##################################################################
># This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
># To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>#   with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
>#
># To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
># listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
>#
># For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>##################################################################
>
>
>




##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
#   with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz